Pastors and students lead campaign to desegregate Danville, VA, 1963

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version
Timing
Time Period:  
May 31,
1963
to
August
1963
Location and Goals
Country: 
United States
Location City/State/Province: 
Danville, Virginia
Goals: 
(1) To form a bi-racial committee to determine a schedule for desegregation of various facilities

(2) To end segregation of public places, such as restaurants, hotels, and schools, which Brown v. Board of Education had mandated nine years prior

(3) To increase employment of blacks in both merchant and municipal jobs

(4) To free and drop all charges against demonstrators that had been arrested

 

The Civil Rights Movement in the United States gained momentum in the 1960’s with campaigns and demonstrations taking place throughout the country. Following the success of the 1963 campaign in Birmingham, Alabama, and the strong leadership of that struggle by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), ministers and other activists in Danville, Virginia, decided to start their own campaign. They formed the Danville Christian Progressive Association (DCPA).

They were aware of the effort required to gain minimal desegregation of the Danville public library system, forced by a campaign in 1960. [Black high school students sit-in, desegregate public libraries in Danville, VA, 1960.]

The African-American citizens of Danville accounted for a quarter of the Danville population. They were tired of the slow move to desegregate public schools, which the Supreme Court had mandated as a result of Brown v. Board of Education nine years earlier.

The DCPA desired the desegregation of restaurants, hotels, and other public places. They objected to the white business owners who often discriminated against employing blacks, either refusing to hire them or giving them the lowest-paying menial jobs. The city government itself did not hire blacks and was exclusively white. The lack of representation for the black community meant that the government never truly addressed their concerns.

The DCPA leaders created a set of demands for the city, including the formation of a bi-racial committee to determine a schedule for the desegregation of public and municipal facilities, the employment of blacks in municipal jobs (particularly the hire of black policemen), and the absolution of previously arrested demonstrators.

Reverend Lawrence Campbell and Reverend Alexander I. Dunlap led students and others in the first action of the new campaign, a march on 31 May 1963. The local press and government ignored this first protest, and no one was arrested.

On 5 June two members of the DCPA (Thurman Echols and Ezell Barksdale) led a demonstration wherein protesters sat in the middle of a main road and blocked traffic. That same day Reverends Campbell and Dunlap and a woman demonstrator walked into city hall and peacefully occupied the city manager’s office. The police knocked Reverend Dunlap down a flight of stairs. Both ministers were arrested along with the woman. Bail was set for $5,500 each, a high bail at that time.

The next day Reverend Campbell telephoned the main office of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in Atlanta and asked for help. Fifteen SNCC workers came to Danville to help in the course of the summer.

On the afternoon of 10 June the campaigners marched again, targeting the municipal building. 37 were arrested after fire hoses fired water on them full blast and police beat some of them with clubs.

That same night Reverend Hildreth G. McGhee led 65 Danville black citizens, joined by a SNCC worker, in walking from the Bible Way Church to the city jail in solidarity with those arrested that afternoon. They sang hymns and circled the jail. Fire hoses were turned on them full force while Rev. McGhee and another SNCC worker recording the event with a camera were arrested, then police clubbed the protesters and arrested some of them. Nearly 50 of the 65 demonstrators were wounded and received treatment at the segregated wing of the hospital.

Mayor Stinson was quoted in The Washington Post, “We will hose down the demonstrators and fill every available stockade.” Danville’s two local newspapers acknowledged that hoses and nightsticks were used.

The next day, 11 June, 200 marched to city hall to see the mayor, who refused to see them.

On 12 June 250 citizens went to see the mayor, led by two pastors and Jim Forman, the SNCC director who had just arrived from Atlanta. The crowd waited at city hall until 11pm when fire trucks arrived, hoses unwound, and police arrived with nightsticks ready. Forman created a diversion so the crowd could get out of the way of the punishing fire hoses. In the meantime, eight reporters were detained inside city hall by police to prevent them witnessing the action outside.

State troopers were dispatched to Danville to assist local police. Municipal employees were deputized to add to police ranks. U.S. military personnel and helicopters (presumably from the National Guard) were reportedly seen. Police not only followed cars driven by SNCC workers, but also pulled out in front of them and drove slowly.

In the meantime, city authorities sought to strengthen the legal grounds for repression. Danville City Council passed an ordinance setting bounds on the size, place, and time of demonstrations. A few weeks later the Council required protesters to apply for a parade permit 30 to 60 days before the parade date.

Despite these measures to limit the scope of demonstrations, protests continued and grew, with activists from the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), as well as attorneys from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) arriving in Danville to participate in various parades and marches. Police arrested protesters for a variety of crimes, including trespassing, disorderly conduct, parading without a permit, resisting arrest, and even simply for being the parent of a minor who had been arrested.

Trials for those that had been arrested began on 17 June. The court was merciless, setting bail at $5,000 for each indicted person in a city where the average non-white household income was $2,578. The judge refused to allow out-of-state attorneys to practice in the court and declined to release those who were convicted while awaiting an appeal. By mid-July, police had arrested over 250 people.

On 9 July the movement announced a boycott of the products of Dan River Mills, the city’s major industrial firm. A week later a demonstration in New York City in solidarity with the boycott was mounted by the International Ladies Garment Workers Union (ILGWU).

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. arrived in Danville on 11 July to speak to a gathering of protesters. However, he refused to lead a march due to the small turnout of about 80 people. Dr. King’s failure to effect change in the static situation was a pivotal disappointment and reflected the slowly diminishing spirits of the African-American community in Danville.

On 28 July 28 campaigners attempted a mass jail-in, but only 70 of the 311 who had agreed to participate were actually jailed.

By 28 August, the day of the massive March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, an estimated 600 people in Danville had been charged with 1200 offenses. The trials and appeals did not end until ten years later, in 1973.

In September demonstrators decreased activity as students returned to school and protesters, frustrated at the lack of progress, returned to their pre-campaign lives.

In February 1973, after the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals reviewed all of the cases from the Danville Corporation Court, the VA Court overturned 270 convictions, upholding only the convictions for trespassing, illegal picketing, and obstructing traffic.

Danville’s 1963 campaign was largely unsuccessful. However, protesters were able to win one concession: in the autumn of 1963, the city officials hired Danville’s first black policeman.

Research Notes
Influences: 
The organizers of the Danville campaign were influenced by the demonstrations that had taken place in Birmingham, Alabama, earlier in 1963 (see "African Americans campaign for equal accommodations, Birmingham, Alabama, USA, 1963") (1).
Sources: 
Danville (Va.) Corporation Court. 1963 Civil Rights Case Files, 1963-1973. Local Government Records Collection, The Library of Virginia, Richmond, Va. 23219. <http://www.lva.virginia.gov/findaid/38099.htm>.

Edmunds, Emma C. "Danville Civil Rights Demonstrations of 1963." Encyclopedia Virginia. Ed. Brendan Wolfe. 29 Jan. 2011. Virginia Foundation for the Humanities. 7 Sep. 2010 <http://www.EncyclopediaVirginia.org/Danville_Civil_Rights_Demonstrations_of_1963>.

Garrow, David J. "Negro Demonstrations and the Law: Danville as a Test Case." We Shall Overcome: the Civil Rights Movement in the United States in the 1950's and 1960's. Vol. 1. Brooklyn, NY: Carlson Pub., 1989. Print.

King, Mary E., "Danville." Freedom Song: A Personal Story of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement (NY: William Morrow and Company, 1987), pp. 79-119.

Additional Notes: 
Some pictures of demonstrations from this campaign can be found here: http://www2.vcdh.virginia.edu/reHIST604/LVAcatalog/index.html
Name of researcher, and date dd/mm/yyyy: 
Jennifer Trinh, 30/01/2011 and George Lakey, 8/21/14