Goals
To decrease the pay differential between the salaries of Western Europeans and Africans, by increasing the salaries of Mauritanian workers.
To have an independent form of trade unionism.
Time period notes
Time period
Country
Location City/State/Province
Location Description
Methods in 1st segment
Methods in 2nd segment
- Teacher and student unions endorsed the Progressive UTM.
Methods in 3rd segment
- Teachers and students went on strike in solidarity with miners.
Methods in 4th segment
- Supporters of imprisoned organizers assembled in the streets of Nouakchott
Methods in 5th segment
Segment Length
Notes on Methods
Leaders
Partners
National Union of Mauritanian Teachers
External allies
Involvement of social elites
Opponents
Mauritanian Government
Nonviolent responses of opponent
Campaigner violence
Repressive Violence
Cluster
Classification
Group characterization
Groups in 2nd Segment
Groups in 3rd Segment
Groups in 4th Segment
Segment Length
Success in achieving specific demands/goals
Survival
Growth
Total points
Notes on outcomes
Database Narrative
In 1959, French, British, Italian, and German interests established a mining and steel-making consortium- Societe Anonyme des Mines de Fer de Mauritanie (MIFERMA)- with the purpose of extracting and exporting resources from Mauritania. MIFERMA became a dominant force in Mauritania’s industrialization. International press celebrated the new iron ore mines as Mauritania’s entry into the 20th century.
After achieving independence from French imperialism in 1960, Mauritania became more vulnerable to the neocolonial force of capitalist production. The single ruling party at the time (Parti Populaire Mauritanien (PPM)) seemed to represent the interests of foreign capital over those of the Mauritanian citizens. Industrialization, coupled with a record drought from 1969 to 1974, forced tens of thousands of Mauritanians to give up their nomadic or subsistence agricultural lifestyles. This new proletariat moved to mining towns or cities, where they lived in slum conditions without running water or electricity.
MIFERMA upheld the colonial practice of privileging foreigners and oppressing indigenous Mauritanians. Europeans occupied 91 percent of the administrative positions in MIFERMA. This discrimination in hiring was accompanied by inequitable wage distribution. The ore miners (usually indigenous Mauritanians) earned about 245,000 francs a year, compared with the 4,350,000 francs being earned annually by the French executives.
In this state of collective hardship, Mauritanian miners united across ethnic divisions. In 1968, miners employed by MIFERMA in Zouerate organized a strike, demanding a wage increase. MIFERMA called on the Mauritanian army to repress the resistance. On 6 June, soldiers killed seven striking workers and wounded 24 others. President Moktar Oguld Daddah, who had sent the troops to the scene, claimed that the soldiers were aiming at the workers’ feet, and that the fatalities only happened because workers were crouching to pick up stones.
In 1968, migrant workers established an organization to represent their interests: the Political Democratic Movement.
In February 1969, the partisan Mauritanian Workers’ Union (UTM)- a federation of all trade unions in the country that had recently been dominated by the Parti Populaire Mauritanien (PPM) – held its annual congress. Some union members asked the group to condemn the government repression of the miners’ strike. The Mauritanian Workers’ Union refused to denounce the violence. A group of workers, who opposed the Party’s control over the federation, established a separate “Progressive UTM.” The National Union of Mauritanian Teachers and the students union endorsed the Progressive UTM. The Mauritanian government refused to recognize it.
In fall 1969, the Progressive UTM organized a series of strikes. The government initially suspended or dismissed teachers and students from Nouadhibou and Npuakchott who participated in the strikes. On 12 November, the government pardoned these teachers and students. The government ordered army commander Ould Mohamed Salah to eliminate the Progressive UTM. Salah agreed that trade unions should not be allowed to criticize the PPM.
In 1970, the Progressive UTM organized more strikes and formed an alliance with the Political Democratic Movement. In January 1971, police arrested fifteen progressive unionists and jailed them without charges. The fifteen prisoners protested their illegal imprisonment by hunger striking. Supporters, including students, assembled on the streets of Nouakchott, demanding that the government release the prisoners and showing support for the Progressive UTM. Riot police repressed this demonstration. The government released the fifteen prisoners on 10 May. On 18 May, the government tried them in court, and found seven of them guilty of “managing an unauthorized association” and four guilty of “distributing leaflets.”
In September and October 1971, the workers and their progressive allies organized another series of strikes. A miners’ strike at the MIFERMA iron ore mine prevented production in Fderik for two months. Though workers may have started with aspirations for socialization of the economy, in the 1971 strikes, workers began demanding that the MIFERMA management include Mauritanians.
In 1972, the Parti Populaire Mauritanien joined the Progressive UTM in its demand for “Mauritanianisation” of MIFERMA. Soon after, PPM began advocating for the nationalization of MIFERMA. By 1973, the UTM progressive faction had disappeared, and the trade union was again entirely in the PPM’s control. On 28 November 1974, the Mauritanian government nationalized MIFERMA, renaming it Societe Nationale Industrelle et Miniere (SNIM).
Influences
Student and worker demonstrations in France in 1968
Sources
"Independence and Civilian Rule." Country Studies. Web. 22 Mar. 2011. <http://countrystudies.us/mauritania/16.html>.
"Mauritania - HISTORY." Rainforest - Mongabay.com. Web. 22 Mar. 2011. <http://www.mongabay.com/reference/country_studies/mauritania/HISTORY.html>.
"Mauritania - Trade Unions." Country Data. Web. 23 Mar. 2011. <http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-8571.html>.
Pazzanita, Anthony G. Historical Dictionary of Mauritania. Historical Dictionaries of Africa. Scarecrow Press, Lanham: 2008. Google E-Book. http://books.google.com/books?id=-KU_9MfXKKYC&pg=PR31&lpg=PR31&dq=mauritania+mine+strike+1968&source=bl&ots=nTl_WPPeaV&sig=ZhsilNHZNJNExW-NTkJuVq3_04g&hl=en&sa=X&ei=AO_4UqLeH6vL0gG42YCoAg&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=mauritania%20mine%20strike%201968&f=false
“Troops Kill 7, Hurt 24 in Mauritania Strike.” Chicago Tribune. 7 June 1968. Proquest Historical Newspapers: Chicago Tribune. Pg. 24. http://search.proquest.com/docview/168795762/7905407570904715PQ/1?accountid=14194
“Mauritania, A Nation of Moorish Nomads, Suddenly Finds Herself in 20th Century: Rich Iron Mines Reshaping Land; Simple Economy of Desert People Gives Way as Huge Ore Facility Opens.” The New York Times. 20 January 1964: 69. ProQuest.