Additional methods (Timing Unknown)
Involvement of social elites
Nonviolent responses of opponent
Groups in 1st Segment
Groups in 4th Segment
Groups in 6th Segment
Success in achieving specific demands/goals
Notes on outcomes
Greenpeace gained a number of new allies when attacked by the U.S. Government.
The problem of illegal mahogany logging was focused in the Brazilian state of Pará, especially in what is termed the “Middle Land”, a plot of Federal public land composed in large part of undisturbed rainforest. Known as “green gold”, mahogany is the most valuable natural resource in this region of the Brazilian Amazon. While there have always been legal avenues by which to utilize this resource, the Brazilian government estimated that as of 2001, 80% of all exported mahogany was being logged illegally. Loggers were bulldozing roads into previously untouched rainforests, home to many animal species as well as indigenous people groups, and taking advantage of the rich mahogany trees that had been growing undisturbed for years.
The Brazilian government was aware of these activities and therefore required that when shipping any mahogany timber, official documentation was necessary. It issued ATPF (Authorization for the Transport of Forest Products) documents in an attempt to control the timber trade. In theory, this would ensure that only mahogany of legal origin would be able to reach the international market. In practice, however, ATPF documents were being sold to companies involved in illegal logging operations and even being given to these companies by the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) when they would consciously overestimate the amount of mahogany growing in a specific plot of land that they were logging legally. By grossly overestimating these numbers, these companies were able to procure enough paperwork to export both their legally and illegally logged mahogany. In 1999 the international environmental group Greenpeace initiated a campaign to curb the illegal logging, in alliance with the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA).
On April 12, 2002, Greenpeace stepped up the campaign by boarding a ship at sea that was carrying a shipment of illegal mahogany. The APL Jade was a container vessel travelling to the port of Miami in the U.S. While other protesters circled the Jade in three smaller watercrafts, Hillary Hosta and Scott Anderson boarded the vessel wearing shirts inscribed “Greenpeace Illegal Forest Crime Unit”, and carrying a banner the read “President Bush, Stop Illegal Logging” which they were ultimately unsuccessful in unfurling.
These two, along with twelve fellow activists, were arrested; six were charged and eventually sentenced to time served. Though they did not ultimately stop the Jade from reaching port with its cargo, these protesters drew additional media and governmental attention to the problem.
In a Brazilian government crackdown, by October 2003 many companies that had been logging illegally lost their rights to land in the Brazilian rainforest and the moratorium on seized illegal mahogany was being enforced. What Greenpeace did not expect was retaliation from the U.S. Government.
In July of 2003 the United States Justice Department seized upon the boarding of the Jade to file a criminal indictment of Greenpeace Inc., the US affiliate of the global Greenpeace movement. Greenpeace was charged with “sailor-mongering,” a law that had last been prosecuted in 1890, which disallowed persons from boarding ships about to arrive in to port because brothel and hotel owners once used to tactic to lure sailors to their establishments.
The case established Greenpeace as the first organization to be prosecuted federally by the U.S. for the nonviolent protest of some of its members. If the charges were upheld against them, it would have set a precedent for the curbing of the First Amendment free speech rights of all nonviolent protesters and organizations which advocated for such protests. When facing such charges, Greenpeace’s campaign took on a fight for civil liberties on top of its environmental concerns as the organization’s First Amendment rights were challenged.
In May of 2004, Greenpeace scored a second victory, as it was acquitted by Judge Adalberto Jordan on all charges against it regarding actions related to the APL Jade.
Greenpeace used the same strategy of nonviolent protest as it had used in many other campaigns (1)
“Partners in Mahogany Crime”, Greenpeace 2001
Edited by George Lakey (17/08/2011)