Nashville students sit-in for U.S. civil rights, 1960


To integrate eating establishments in Nashville.

To "push the fight for Negro rights beyond the purely legal area and into the field of what they call moral rights, which they say include the common amenities of life, about which white people scarcely stop to think" (Taken from “Negroes in Nashville Trained to Maintain Passive Resistance”)

Time period

13 February, 1960 to May, 1960


United States

Location City/State/Province

Nashville, Tennessee

Location Description

eating establishments, drug stores, department stores, bus terminals, variety stores
Jump to case narrative

Methods in 1st segment

Methods in 2nd segment

Methods in 3rd segment

Methods in 4th segment

Methods in 6th segment

Segment Length

Approximately 15 days


Diane Nash, John Lewis, and James M. Lawson, Jr.
Nashville Student Movement


SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinationg Committee), NCLC (National Christian Leadership Conference), Z. Alexander Looby

External allies

Not known

Involvement of social elites

Not Known


Nashville store owners, Mayor Ben West

Nonviolent responses of opponent

Not known

Campaigner violence

Not known

Repressive Violence

There was one-sided violence from sit-in opponents towards the protestors. They also bombed the house of Z. Alexander Looby, the defense attorney for the sit-in protesters.


Human Rights
National-Ethnic Identity



Group characterization


Groups in 1st Segment

Diane Nash
John Lewis
James M. Lawson Jr.

Groups in 5th Segment


Segment Length

Approximately 15 days

Success in achieving specific demands/goals

6 out of 6 points


1 out of 1 points


3 out of 3 points

Total points

10 out of 10 points

Notes on outcomes

The campaign was successful in the desegregation of lunch counters in Nashville. They were also able to desegregate other establishments in the city.

The students remained unified throughout the campaign, and other organizations such as SNCC and NCLC not only remained intact, but grew both during and after the campaign.

The campaign started with 40 students in the first sit-in, and grew to over 2,500 supporters by the end of the campaign.

Database Narrative

Starting in February of 1960, students began sit-ins in various stores in Nashville, Tennessee, with the goal of desegregation at lunch counters.  Students from Fisk University, Baptist Theological Seminary, and Tennessee State University, mainly led by Diane Nash and John Lewis, began the campaign that became a successful component of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, and was influential in later campaigns.

On February 13, 1960, twelve days after the Greensboro sit-in (see "Greensboro, NC, students sit-in for U.S. Civil Rights, 1960"), students in Nashville entered Kress, Woolworth, and McClellan stores at 12:40 pm.  After making purchases, the students sat at the lunch counters; two hours later, the owners closed the counters without serving any of the students.  Storeowners claimed that it was a “moral right” to decide whom they would or would not serve to.  During the next three months the sit-ins continued, not only at the three stores initially targeted but also at the Greyhound and Trailways bus terminals, a Grant’s variety store, a Walgreens drugstore, and major Nashville department stores Cain-Sloan and Harvey.

The first violent responses from the opposition occurred on February 27, which Jim Lawson, Jr., another leader of the campaign, called “Big Saturday.”  A group of agitators attacked the sit-in, resulting in the arrest of eighty-one protesters and zero white opponents.  The protesters were found guilty of disorderly conduct, for which they decided to serve time in jail rather than pay the fines.  “Big Saturday” also resulted in Lawson’s expulsion from Vanderbilt University.  Expulsion was a major threat for many of the participants in the sit-ins; however, the prospects of what the successful campaign would bring to African-Americans outweighed the risks.  To further emphasize the importance of the protests, campaign leader Diane Nash said, “I want a good America and I want that just a little bit more than a college degree.”

In an attempt to mediate between the storeowners and the protesters, Mayor Ben West appointed a biracial committee to investigate segregation in the city.  However, despite numerous attempts at a compromise, the students declared that they would accept nothing less than the acknowledgement of their rights to sit at the store lunch counters along with white customers.  On April 5, the committee suggested that the counters be divided into black and white sections.  The National Christian Leadership Conference (NCLC), which acted on behalf of the Nashville Student Movement, rejected the proposal, thus resulting in a standoff.

Although sit-ins were the main form of nonviolent action, singing became an influential mode of protest as the campaign continued.  Freedom singers began creating songs based on traditional black spirituals, changing the words as necessary to “reflect the daily confrontations and ideological principles of the movement.”  Young protesters used these songs to form a positive new cultural identity for blacks.  Singing was also one of the main ways in which SNCC fostered grass-roots leadership.

There was finally a drastic turning point when a bomb destroyed the home of Z. Alexander Looby, the defense attorney for the protestors, on April 19.  This event triggered a mass march to City Hall, where the students held a prayer session and demanded answers from Mayor West.  The mayor, who had previously disliked the students in charge of the sit-ins because of the resulting damage to the business owners in Nashville, changed his opinion after the increasingly violent attacks from white agitators.  During his response to the crowd of over 2,500 protestors, West said, “I appeal to all citizens to end discrimination, to have no bigotry, no bias, no discrimination,” which was received with cheering and applause.  The next day, the headline of the Nashville Tennessean read, “Mayor Says Integrate Counters,” and within three weeks stores began to desegregate their lunch counters. 

Nashville was the first major southern city to desegregate public facilities, and the campaign was used as an example for future civil rights campaigns, especially student-run.  Although there was negativity and opposition throughout most of the campaign, there was also support from a variety of sources, including Southern press.  In the Virginia-Norfolk Journal and Guide Gordon B. Hancock wrote, “Nothing would be more disastrous than a cessation of protest against the unchristian and the undemocratic.  These sit-down students have been taught in our great American history that resistance to tyranny is honorable and righteous…” Student groups also made an influential debut into the fight for desegregation.  Previously in the background of the movement, the students had emerged as new leaders; they introduced new nonviolent approaches to achieving integration, for, in their opinion, they had nothing to lose.


The Nashville sit-ins were influenced by the Greensboro sit-ins in North Carolina (see "Greensboro, NC, students sit-in for U.S. Civil Rights, 1960"). (1)

The sit-ins played a pivotal role in the Shaw University sit-ins, and were used as models in other desegregation actions. (2)


"American Experience: Eyes on the Prize." PBS: Public Broadcasting Service. Web. 25 Jan. 2011. <>.

Axelrod, Alan. Minority Rights in America. Washington, DC: CQ, 2002. Print.

Bird, Robert S. "Negroes in Nashville Trained to Maintain Passive Resistance." The Windsor Star, 4 Apr. 1960. Print.

Bloom, Alexander. Long Time Gone: Sixties America Then and Now. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001. Print.

"Bomb Blasts Integration Leader’s Home." The Los Angeles Times 20 Apr. 1960. Print.

Lowery, Charles D., and John F. Marszalek. Encyclopedia of African-American Civil Rights: from Emancipation to the Present. New York: Greenwood, 1992. Print.

"Negroes Win Dining Rights in Nashville: Secret Parleys Bring Lunch Counter Peace." The Chicago Tribune, 11 May 1960. Print.

York, Steve, prod. A Force More Powerful. PBS. 2000. Television. (not viewed)

Ackerman, Peter and Jack Duvall. A Force More Powerful: A Century of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.

Name of researcher, and date dd/mm/yyyy

Aly Passanante, 30/01/2011